The effect of using different energy sources and levels on carcass weight, breast muscle mass, mTORC1 and AKt gene expression in Cobb 500 broiler chicks

Sayed Mostafa Akbari, Ali Asghar Sadeghi, Mehdi Aminafshar, Parvin Shawrang, Mohammad Chamani

Resumo


The present study was aimed to evaluate the effect of different energy sources and levels on carcass weight, breast muscle mass mTORC1 and AKt gene expression in Cobb 500 broiler chicks. A total of 600 1-day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks with an average weight of 39 ± 0.50 g were randomly divided into five treatments. Each treatment was further divided into four replicates. Chicks were fed by basal diet based on corn and energy level by Cobb 500 instruction manual as control group, basal diet with 3% lesser energy than control (T1), basal diet with 6% lesser energy than control (T2), basal diet based on corn and fat level according to Cobb 500 instruction manual (T3), basal diet based on corn and fat with 3% upper energy (T4) for 42 days. To assess carcass characteristics two chicks of each replication were slaughtered and weighted after picking the carcasses. After DNA extraction, the UV spectrophotometric method was performed for determines the quality and quantity and Real-time PCR was performed on the corresponding cDNA synthesized from each sample. Data from this study showed that there were significant differences about carcass and breast muscle weight between treatments (P <0.05). As result obtained from this study the highest mTORC1 and AKt gene expression were for T4 and T3, T2, T1 had higher gene expression compared to control respectively. In conclusion higher levels of energy are needed for Cobb 500, for both mTORC1 and AKt gene expression as well as the more carcass and breast muscle influences.

Palavras-chave


Breast muscle mass mTORC1, AKt gene expression in Cobb 500 broiler chicks

Referências


ABDULLAH, A.Y., MATARNEH, S.K.: Broiler Performance and the Effects of Carcass Weight, Broiler Sex, and Postchill Carcass Aging duration on Breast Fillet Quality Characteristics. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 19(1), 46-58, 2010.

ADEGOKE, O.A.J., ABDULLAHI, A, AND TAVAJOHI-FINI, P.: mTORC1 and the Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Anabolism and Mass. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 37., 395-406, 2012.

AKHTER, S., KHAN, M.Z.U., ANJUM, M. I., AHMED, S., RIZWAN, M., IJAZ, M.: Investigation on the Availability of Amino Acids from Different Animal Protein Sources in Golden Cockerels. J. Anim. Plant Sci.18(2-3):53e4, 2008.

BOGOSAVLJEVI.BOŠKOVIĆ, S., PAVLOVSKIĆ, Z., PETROVIĆ, M.D., DOSKOVIĆ, V., RAKONJAC, S.: Broiler Meat Quality. Proteins and lipids of Muscle Tissue-review, Afr. J. Biotech. 9 (54), 9177-9182, 2010.

BOTTJE, W., BRAND, M.D., OJANO-DIRAIN, C., LASSITER, K., TOYOMIZU, M., WING, T.: Mitochondrial Proton Leak Kinetics and Relationship with Feed Efficiency within a Single Genetic Line of Male Broilers. Poult. Sci. 88: 1683–1693, 2009.

BOTTJE, W.G, WHIKONG, B., JEEYONG, L., WASHINGTOON, T., JAMIE, I., DRIDI, S., WING, T AND HARDMAN, J.: Potential Rols of mTOR and Protein Degradation Pathways in the Phenotypic Expression of Feed Efficiency in Broilers. Biochem Physiol 3: 125, 2014.

Broiler Performance and Nutrition Supplement Cobb 500. Revised October 2013. (Cobb- Vantress. Com).

DUNCAN, D.B. Multiple Range and Multiple Ftest. Biometrics, 11:1, 1955.

JAFARNEJAD, S AND SADEGH, M.2011. The Effects Of Different Levels of Dietary Protein,Energy and Using Fat on the Performance of Broiler Chicks at the end of the Third Weeks. Asian J. Poult. Sci, 5(1):35-40.

KAMRAN, Z., MIRZA, M.A., HAQ, A.U AND MAHMOOD, S.: Effect of Decreasing Dietary Protein Levels with Optimum Amino Acids Profile on the Performance of Broilers. Pak. Vet. J, 24(4): 165- 168, 2004.

KONG BW., SONG JJ., LEE JY., HARGIS BM., WING T., LASSITER K., BOTTJE W.: Gene Expression in Breast Muscle associated with Feed Efficiency in a Single Male Broiler Line using a Chicken 44K Oligo Microarray. I. Top Differentially Expressed Genes. Poult Sci.; 90 (11): 2535-47, 2011.

LEESON, S., SUMMERS, J.D.: Nutrition of the Chicken. 4th ed. Ontario:University Books. 591p, 2001.

LEE, J.: Transcriptomic Analysis to Elucidate the Molecular basis of Feed Efficiency in Meat-Type Chickens. PhD Dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, 2012.

LIVAK, K.J., SCHMITTENGENT, T.D.: Methods Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data using Real Time Quantitative PCR and the 2 (- Delta Delta C (T) ). Methods 25, 402-408, 2001.

MARCU, A., STEF, L.; DUMITRESCU, G.; PETCULESCU CIOCLRNA, L.; DRONCA, D.; PET, I.; BAUL, S.; MARCU, A.: The influence of Nutrition, Sex and Slaughter Age on Characteristics or Pectoral is Major Muscle at Broiler Chickens Ross-308. Anim Sci and Biotech, 47(2) p: 271-278, 2014.

MARCU, A., VACARU-OPRIS, I., MARCU, A.: The Influence of Fed Protein and Energy level on Meat Chemical Composition from Different Anatomical Regions at,, Cobb 5oo,, hybrid, Scientific Papers Anim Sci and Biotech Timisoara, 42(2), 147 – 150, 2009.

Maiorka, A., DahIke, F., Santin, E., Kessler, A.M., Penzjr, A.M.: Effect of Energy Levels of Diets Formulated on total or Digestible Amino acid Basis on Broiler Performance. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 6. (2), 87-91, 2004.

MIRAGLIA, D.; MAMMOLI, R.; BRANCIARI, R.; RANUCCI,D.; CENCI GOGA, B. T.: Characterization of Muscle Fibre Type and Evaluation of the Presence of Giant Fibers in Two Meat Chicken Hybrids. Veterinary Research Communications, 30 (Suppl. 1), 357–360, 2006.

NOBRE R.T.R., SILVA D.J., FONSECA J.B., SILVA, M.A., LANA, G.R.Q.: Efeito do nível de energia sobre a qualidade da carcaça de diferentes grupos genéticos de frangos de corte. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia .23(4):603-613, 1994.

POORGHASEMI, M. R., SEIDAVI, A., ALAW QOTBI, A.A., LAUDADIO, V AND TUFARELLI, V.: Influence of Dietary Fat Fource on Growth Performance Responses and Carcass Traits of Broiler Chickens. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 5:705-710, 2013.

RESURRECCION, A. V. A.: Sensory Aspects of Consumer Choices for Meat and Meat Products. Meat Sci. 66:11–20, 2002.

SENGUPTA, S., PETERSON, T.R., AND SABATINI, D.M.: Regulation of the mTOR Complex 1 Pathway by Nutrients,Growth Factors,and Stress. Mol. Cell, 40 (2):310-322,2010.

SAS Institute. SAS. (Statistical Analysis System).: User´s Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2001.

SCHEUERMANN, G. N., BILGILI, S.F., TUZUN, S., MULVANEY, D.R.: Comparison of Chicken Genotypes, Myofiber Number in Pectoralis Muscle and Myostatin Ontogeny, Poultry Science, 83, 1404-1412, 2004.

TUMOVA, E., TEIMOURI, A .: Chicken Muscle Fibers Characteristics and Meat Quality: A review. Journal Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 40 (4): 253-258. URL, 2009.

ZHUO, Z., LAMONT, S. J., LEE, W. R., ABASHT, B.: RNA-Seq Analysis of Abdominal Fat Reveals Differences between Modern Commercial Broiler Chickens with High and Low Feed Efficiencies. Plos one 10(8). J. Pona. 0135810, 2015.


Texto completo: PDF

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


 


 

 

Counters
Visitas